Add parallel Print Page Options

29 But if the ox had the habit of goring, and its owner was warned[a] but he did not take the necessary precautions,[b] and then it killed a man or a woman, the ox must be stoned and the man must be put to death. 30 If a ransom is set for him,[c] then he must pay the redemption for his life according to whatever amount was set for him. 31 If the ox[d] gores a son or a daughter, the owner[e] will be dealt with according to this rule.[f]

Read full chapter

Footnotes

  1. Exodus 21:29 tn The Hophal perfect has the idea of “attested, testified against.”
  2. Exodus 21:29 tn Heb “he was not keeping it” or perhaps guarding or watching it (referring to the ox).
  3. Exodus 21:30 sn The family of the victim would set the amount for the ransom of the man guilty of criminal neglect. This practice was common in the ancient world, rare in Israel. If the family allowed the substitute price, then the man would be able to redeem his life.
  4. Exodus 21:31 tn Heb “it”; the referent (the ox) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
  5. Exodus 21:31 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the owner) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
  6. Exodus 21:31 tn Heb “according to this judgment it shall be done to him.”